African Countries: Three Deficits and Three Futures

African Countries: Three Deficits and Three Futures

By Amb.  Eloho Otobo

Recent developments in the region have left many wondering what to make of its prospects in a context where the evidence of strong economic performance and democratic consolidation in some countries is juxtaposed with continuing conflicts or violence in others and coups still in others.

In a piece for the Financial Times titled ” Recognise efforts to strengthen democracy in Africa” 27 December 2006, I argued that African countries can be divided into four categories according to where they lie on the peace and development spectrum: those still in conflict; those emerging from conflict; those where democratic stability is racked by disruptive political tensions and undermined by weak institutions and governance practices; and those where democratic consolidation is buttressed by stable economic growth.

On careful examination, it emerges that there are three main  structural constraints that have impeded Africa’s development in the past and still cast long shadows over its long term prospects. I refer to these obstacles as deficits in Africa’s development.

Individual African countries suffer in varying degrees from three main deficits:  stability deficit, organizational deficit and scientific and technological deficit. To paint a more accurate portrait, several African countries suffer from stability deficit; many suffer from organizational deficit and most from scientific and technological deficit.

Africa’s stability deficit manifests itself in several ways, most notably in conflicts, serial coups, and weak rule of law and weak democratic governance practices. Organizational deficit encapsulates both institutional weakness and serious capacity deficiencies.

Africa’s scientific and technological deficits are manifested in such indicators as low share of gross national product devoted to scientific and technological research, the low share of manufacturing and of high technology products in exports and poor quality of tertiary education. Many African countries have pronounced deficits in each of these areas.

Conventional analyses of progress or lack of it in Africa have focussed either on the political situation or economic trends. Seldom are the two brought together and even much rarer is the case when the political, organizational and the scientific and technological dimensions combined to offer a comprehensive view.

Yet, the link between mastery of science and technology and economic development is enduring and strong. Economic power is directly correlated with scientific power. No nation can emerge as an economic power or even a military power without first being a leading nation in science and technology.

By integrating the stability, organizational and scientific and technological perspectives, it is possible to gain considerable insights into the factors that will shape the futures of African countries. The picture that emerges from that composite portrait is clear: all African countries do not face the same futures. Instead, Africa countries face three distinct futures.

To understand how those futures will evolve is to understand the points of intersections among political stability, organizational competence and scientific and technological capacity. The group of countries that combine political stability, organizational competence and scientific and technological prowess will emerge as the most competitive. This combination of attributes means that the governments of these countries will exert significant regional or even extra-regional influence, their companies will extend their presence beyond national and continental boundaries into other continents driven by growing organizational competence and mastery of science and technology.

More than these countries need political stability to buttress their economic growth; they need strong scientific and technological skills to climb up the product value chain at competitive cost structure. This group of countries will be few indeed. To draw on the metaphor of lions, that now suffuses a growing number of reports on the region, I refer to this category of countries as the “roaring lions”.

The next category of countries will be those that have a modicum of political stability and organizational competence but low mastery of scientific and technological know how.  To the extent that their firms will compete, it will mainly be in a sub-regional context and in very limited sectors. One of the reasons for this is that the labour force of these countries will not offer better technical skills relative to the cost of labour (wages) found elsewhere in the continent or around the world. Similarly, their governments might hold some sway only in a sub-regional and to some extent in the continental context.  These countries will be in a mode of regional cooperation not global competitiveness. I refer to this group as the “shackled lions”.

The third  category of countries are those plagued by continuing political instability or the ever present danger of lapsing or relapsing into conflict in the context of weak institutions and very limited managerial capacity. Countries in this category will manifest the traits of what I refer to as “recovering” or “wounded lions”. These countries have high political risk with limited upside potentials with regard to investment opportunities, given their weak infrastructure and negligible scientific and technological know how.

Whether individual African countries are able to overcome the three deficits will determine what the future holds for each of them. The countries that make most progress in addressing or overcoming the three deficits will emerge politically stable, socially cohesive and economically vibrant. In those country contexts, the good news about the region will endure and that will comprehensively undermine the uniformly bleak portrayal frequently dominate some foreign commentaries about the continent.

Ejeviome Eloho Otobo, Director and Deputy Head of the United Nations Peacebuilding Support Office, wrote in his personal capacity. This is a slightly revised version of what was published by The Vanguard of Nigeria on 20 December 2010.

Advertisements

About africapeacesupport

Former Representative of the United Nations SecretaryGeneral in Guinea-Bissau and Head of UNOGBIS.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s